Friday, 14 November 2008
However, I was thinking that our so called intellectuals are always ready to criticize the economic policies. By intellectuals I do not mean professional economists but those people who always appear in the TV talk shows and take calls of economists.
As written in one of the newspaper that according to bankers and business leaders it is done in response to the preconditions of IMF. This might show a negative image of government but if we look in other way that Government deliberately delayed increase in interest rate in view that IMF will have precondition and they’ll again ask us to increase interest rate.
Now we’ll come to another point. A TV talk show criticized the autonomy of SBP without knowing the background of the issue of autonomy of Central Bank which was started in 1983. The core objective is to control inflation at the minimum possible level. Autonomy to the Central Bank implies that the Governor’s primary objective is to control inflation irrespective of what is going on with the other variables including unemployment, GDP growth etc. Moreover, it is also important that the Governor should be conservative central banker who hates inflation.
In another article in the newspaper it is rightly mentioned that lawmakers criticized the government for bypassing parliament in accepting IMF conditionalties. It would have been nice if we decide these decisions in the parliament and senate and tell them the need or no need of loans either by IMF or other international funds and foreign countries. In this way we’ll build a proper system and we’ll educate our parliamentarians about the economic system as well. Another plus point of this system would be transparency if the loan taken and spending will be evaluated in the Senate and Parliament.
Finally, I was really surprised on the statements by several senators who, I guess, should know that point of autonomy. It is quite possible that this government would want to appoint their own Governor instead of Dr Shamshad as her first term is about to complete.
It is important to mention here that decrease in interest rate increase money supply which directly affects inflation in the long run. This long run could be one and half years to two years. Right now our overall average inflation is too high and this is mainly due to the policies of last government and we cannot ignore the fact that it could be due to interest rate decline two years ago. Increase in interest rate will not affect inflation instantly but it might take inflation one year to come down. Dr Shamshad did the right thing by increasing interest rate, though I believe that it should be done at least 6 months ago, considering inflation expectations.
Friday, 31 October 2008
Pakistan is hit by a earthquake of 6.5 magnitude. The death toll has risen to 236 whereas 391 people were injured. The toll is expected to climb further. Pakistan army, FC, government, political parties and charity organizations are carrying out rescue operations in quake-hit areas. we appeal to you to extend your hand to the affectees in Pakistan.
There are several ways to help them one way to help them is in monetary terms and Zakat Foundation has set up a field office to distribute food packages and packages of blankets and warm clothes to these desperate people. Please make a donation to enable the Zakat Foundation to help the suffering people of Pakistan.
- Food Package Items Quantity Unit Cost
- Flour 10 kg $10.00
- Rice 5 kg $8.00
- Cooking Oil/Ghee 1 liter $2.00
- Sugar 2 kg $1.00
- Chana 2 kg $1.50
- Tea .5 kg $1.00
- TOTAL FOOD PACKAGE COST $23.50
- Your donation of $2,500 will provide Food Packages for 100 needy families.
- Your donation of $1,250 will provide Food Packages for 50 needy families.
- Your donation of $625 will provide Food Packages for 25 needy families.
- Your donation of $250 will provide Food Packages for 10 needy families.
- Your donation of $100 will provide Food Packages for 4 needy families.
You can donate at http://www.thezakat.org/orhttp://www.erra.gov.pk/WebForms/NewsDetails.aspx?id=320
For further information email me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Wednesday, 21 May 2008
Increase in exchange rate directly affects prices through increase in prices of imported products, which may include food products. Indirectly it affects through increase in the bill (in Rs.) for oil. Prices of oil are creping up to $127/barrel, which is increasing cost of production and depreciation in exchange rate creates a double impact on the cost of production. Increase in cost of production thus increases the domestic prices. However, how much it will increase prices is a major question.
Increase in cost of production will decrease profitability and investment, which directly affects GDP. Decrease in investment affects employment generation as well, which decrease the wage rate because the unemployment will be involuntary.
Moreover, increase in prices lead to decrease in real wages, and decrease in the welfare level of the people. Decrease in purchasing power leads to decrease in consumption, which has the major share in GDP.
On the other hand, it is good to let exchange rate float in the market which was overvalued for the last three years at least. Because foreign exchange intervention in the open market has its on drawbacks. Theoretically, free float removes the imbalances in balance of payment but it can only be done if there are no market discrepancies but in a country like Pakistan we need to think it twice whether it is true or not given the current circumstances. There are certain other advantages of floating exchange rate, e.g., we can use monetary policy effectively, we do not need to change our trade policy very often etc.
However we need to think whether there is a need to stabilize exchange rate at some par value or within some range or let it float wherever it goes. Does stability in exchange rate in Pakistan has fruitful affects on economy or we need to know some threshold level of stability in exchange rate. In the presence of supply shock, e.g. oil price shock, can we keep exchange rate at some par value or within some range. Above all, Is there any pass – through effect of exchange rate on prices because Hyder and Shah (2004) concluded that there is a moderate effect of exchange rate on CPI but stronger in case of WPI.
Comments are always welcome
Hyder, Z. and S. Shah (2004), “Exchange Rate Pass – Through to Domestic Prices in Pakistan, Working Paper #5, State Bank of Pakistan.
Tuesday, 8 January 2008
Sunday, 6 January 2008
Secured property rights reduce the insecurity of land. It also reduces the workload of the courts to settle disputes and credit availability to small farmers is easier due to property ownership. Moreover, it generates tax revenues and prevents cost and time overruns in development projects involving land acquisition. Thus property rights are inverse transaction cost and increase efficiency.
Pakistan’s property rights system has several anomalies such as benami transactions and general power of attorney. There are several loopholes in the system through which big landlords with the help of authority personals avoid/evade taxes and create a scenario where the third (any other) party remains deprived off using the land.
Corruption of authorities is an undeniable fact. Several cases of corruption are reported in Foqia Khan’s paper on Property right in Pakistan in the Lahore Development Authority (LDA), which is the main registration authority in Lahore. Authority personals ask for bribe to issue allotment letter for an already purchased plot, accessing a file, giving NOC etc.
Designing property rights is the most concerned thing because we need to take care of customs and social norms in Pakistan in designing the formal rules otherwise enforcement would be very difficult। Enforcement is the most important element after the rules have been made. The enforcement should be done by third party who is neutral and acceptable to both the parties (buyers and sellers).
Designing property rights is the most important step. One need to see at the increase in transaction cost, which can be financed through increase in revenues and setting up some funds for it। Douglas C North argues that to get better outcomes we need to build formal laws based on cultural and social norms (informal constraints) and enforcement characteristics। Thus if people need to learn a totally different system then this might be the major informal constraint. Thus, it should be designed in such a way that the system would be formal, procedure remains the same and there should have third party enforcement which is neutral and acceptable to both parties. Third party enforcement in informal way will definitely reduce the transaction cost in the short run but in the long run in case of disputes the transaction cost will rise. On the other hand, doing it informally will reduce the potential revenues which a government can get otherwise. Thus formal third party enforcement is better as an enforcement agency.
Following are some of the points which can improve the property rights system in Pakistan. First ten points are take from PIDE Policy View Point Number 3.
1. Removal of obsolete and dysfunctional systems managed by Patwaris, Tehsildars, Tapedars, and Mukhtiarkars.
2. Set up a system of guaranteeing title to land rather than a system that merely serves the purpose of registration of documents.
3. GIS is a good way of enabling quick and efficient recording of title transfers. Though it will be expensive initially but it can be financed through increased tax revenues and setting up special fund for this purpose.
4. There is a need to establish a centralized land registry system in the form of a central registration of title of the most expensive and commercially attractive land, which should be Excise and Taxation Department (ETD) in the provincial governments.
5. There should be a requirement for compulsory registration of all documents relating to property including sale agreements, declaration of gifts, awards, transfers, and powers of attorney.
6. General Powers of Attorney should be abolished altogether [PIDE Policy Viewpoint (2007)].
7. Benami transactions should be declared unlawful [PIDE Policy Viewpoint (2007)].
8. Any suit with respect to any immovable property should be compulsorily registered with the Registrar of the High Court. The Registration Act and the Stamp Duty Act should be amended to reflect this. Moreover, by linking court records to the computer database of the Registrar, prospective buyers would be informed that the property is under litigation.
9. Simultaneously, the government could start a process of converting presumptive titles into exclusive titles after preparing draft lists that would be open to public inspection for a period of 6 months, during which objections and disputes would be settled.
10. One of the main reasons for the long delays in settling title disputes in the courts of law is the system of multiple appeals and revisions even in the case of a small property dispute. This system must be replaced by one in which a party in a civil claim does not have a right of more than one appeal. The final court of appeal should be the High Court, and not the Supreme Court, since property is a provincial subject.
11. Torrens system of land titling is a parcel based system, which is followed in the rural areas and is very successful in Australia. Following this system people may not need to know entirely new system, which helps in reducing the transaction cost initially.
12. One of the main problems identified in Section III was that main emphasis of the registration process is on the identification of parties instead of identification of property. Thus an authority needs to check the existence of property before getting sign the contract between the parties and should not put ask the party to check the authenticity of the existence of property. This evolves the issue of enforcement which should be formal system and done by the registration authority who are registering the titles.
13.The enforcement authority should endure the legality of transaction, actual price of the property and buyer should pay the total amount to the seller as well as revenues to the revenue authority.
Third party enforcement is a better idea for having good property rights law but pertaining to current system of development authorities or revenue boards it is extremely unlikely that it is going to happen on fair basis. Fair role of enforcement authority, i.e., they should treat everyone equally and in a justified way. Moreover, we need to change our habits and role of individual behavior is very important for it. Unless enforcement authority does not do their work with honesty and sincerity, people will not believe in the system and the mindset of the people will not be changed. On the other hand if the individual behavior (mindset) and habits are changed that each individual do not bribe the authorities to have their work done, then the corruption will definitely decrease. Some authors find that (1) it may be optimal to allow some corruption and not enforce property rights fully; (2) less developed economies may choose lower levels of property right enforcement and more corruption; and (3) there may exist a 'free-lunch' such that over a certain range it is possible simultaneously to reduce corruption, increase investment, and achieve a better allocation of talent
Titling and registration of property rights in a formal way, coherent with informal constraints, would definitely increase corruption in short run, i.e., in the period of transition. But in the long run when the system is setup we can hope that the extent of corruption will decrease. Most important, if the punishment and enforcement of punishment for taking and giving bribe is very strong then people and authorities would fear of punishment and corruption will be reduced. This would change the habits and behavior of the people.
 This issue was discussed, among other issues, in the PIDE-LUMS seminar on “Law and Economics” in June 2006